Tech guru John Dvorak once called the Windows 8 operating system an "unmitigated disaster." He predicted that the public and business sectors would demand a return to Windows 7 -- a product considered one of Microsoft 's best operating systems. Other critics chimed in, saying you can't take a user interface that works on a smartphone and expect it to be successful on a PC .
Now, pundits are quietly shaking their heads, wondering not what went wrong but why Microsoft wasn't aware that touch for work devices was a design, marketing, earnings, and branding disaster waiting to happen.
No doubt, touchscreen smartphones have been the rage of the decade and in beauty and design Apple captured the touchscreen throne with the iPhone.
Trouble is, a computing experience is not a smartphone experience. On Sunday, Frederic Lardinois of TechCrunch provided this one-year update of Microsoft's touch debacle: "'Touch first' -- which begat Windows 8 and the Surface -- was the wrong move. That ship has sailed."
Off the Tracks
Microsoft's recent bad quarter -- earnings missed Wall Street estimates -- included the $900 million write-down against Surface RT inventory adjustments. It seemed Microsoft was on a "touch-first" ride that fell off the tracks. And Windows 8 was part of the problem.
Introduced last year, Windows 8 was promoted as proof of a new era for Microsoft Windows -- a scale-up from touch on small phone screens to full screens that you could work on with or without your old-fashioned keyboard and mouse.
However, most users did not care for the Windows 8 touch interface. But the failure of the Windows 8 touch feature was not, as some proponents tried to shape it, a matter of old habits dying hard. The failure of touch was more of a square peg chafing against a round hole.
Angle, Distance, Time
David Pogue offered some possible explanations in the Scientific American article, "Why Touch Screens Will Not Take Over." He noted that although Microsoft provided mouse and keyboard equivalents, they appeared to be intended as crutches until such time as touch would control all computers.
Forget about screen smudges and finger marks. Here are the real differences between PCs and touch screens: angle, distance, and time intervals.
"The screen of a phone or tablet is generally more or less horizontal," Pogue said. "The screen of a desktop (or a laptop on a desk), however, is more or less vertical." (continued...)
Posted: 2013-07-27 @ 7:26pm PT
You are so right. I have a touchscreen windows 8 laptop computer. The touch is unpredictable, it zooms in and out at will. Windows 8 is very restrictive as to what can be downloaded. I cannot play Facebook games. This is just the tip of the iceberg. I have worn out the tech support team. It is 2 months old but they will not allow a trade-in value toward the purchase of a new $1000.00+ System. Any help would be appreciated.
Posted: 2013-07-27 @ 8:06am PT
Voice commands being the future? Sounds like BS to me. I would never, never, never "type" a document, presentation, ect with voice commands. This is why I never use that "feature" on my phone. Why would I want to on my desktop/laptop? Simply put, I wouldn't. If tech companies like Microsoft think that voice commands are the future technology, they truly are out of touch. No big surprise considering how Windows 8, is half an operating system and half a tablet, and captures the worst of both worlds, very effectively.
Posted: 2013-07-25 @ 8:56pm PT
If you think touch is a bad interface, "voice" will be about 1000 times less precise. For example, imagine trying to control your car in 80 mph traffic in an urban setting with voice. Or just look at how long and how many voice commands it took "Decker" in "Blade Runner" to zoom in on a particular spot on a photo. Think how long it would take to build and fill a moderately complex excel spreadsheet with JUST voice commands.