When Microsoft first announced its new way of licensing products two years ago, corporations balked. It was not so much the
entirety of Licensing 6.0 that bothered them as the Software Assurance program. That part of the new agreement took away version upgrades and required enterprises to pay up-front for a two- or three-year upgrade
contract.
The program's high price, coupled with the absence of any guarantee that Microsoft would come out with timely upgrades, provoked overwhelming customer disapproval. In a
survey of 4,000 IT managers by Giga Information Group and Sunbelt Software,
a consulting company, more than half of those questioned said they were not
going to sign up for Licensing 6.0.
But expressing disapproval about a licensing program and doing something
about it are two different things. The evidence suggests Microsoft's
Software Assurance program has caused some IT managers to defect to other
platforms, particularly Linux. And more defections could be on the horizon.
Revolt Brewing?
In the end, up to about two-thirds of Microsoft customers did not sign up for
Software Assurance, according to analysts. "We think a third have enterprise
agreements and another third made a decision not to do anything," Alvin
Park, research director at Gartner, told NewsFactor, noting that the final third bought upgrades on part of their licenses. That third probably will repurchase licenses at some point in the future, but they will have no upgrade rights, he said.
Microsoft declined to provide details on how many or what percentage of its
customers had opted for Software Assurance.
Will companies make wholesale moves to other platforms? It is still early to
make that judgment, according to Park. "I haven't seen any mass defections yet," he
said.
But Microsoft's licensing gaffe has caused enterprises to begin looking at
the competition and performing cost analyses on whether it would be
beneficial to move to alternate products, Park said. "That type of
movement, if it occurs, is just now beginning," he noted. "It will be important to watch
in the next two years how many [companies] move to alternative-source or
open-source platforms."
How Much Is Enough?
Although competing products may not be as robust as Microsoft's, that is not the issue, Park said. They may provide enough functionality to meet the needs of individual enterprises, which is what really matters.
David Roberts, chief executive of the UK-based Corporate IT Forum, told
NewsFactor that he knows of at least eight organizations that are
considering a change in their commitment to Microsoft. "They have made an
investment in time and people to examine how they could reduce the total
number of Microsoft licenses by trying to identify which ones they might be
able to move," Roberts said. (continued...)
|