The custody battle over two American twins adopted over the Internet by a
British couple has renewed controversy over the role of the Internet in
adoptions.
The British couple, Alan and Judith Kilshaw, adopted twin girls over the
Internet from their American mother, Tranda Wecker, by paying UK₤800 to Caring Heart
Adoption, a Net-based firm. The Kilshaws were unaware, however, that Wecker had already
sold the twins to another couple, Richard and Vickie Allen of California, for UK₤4,000.
After visiting the girls at the Allen home, the birthmother secretly took
the girls and resold them.
Adoption advocacy groups say the Internet can serve a legitimate
purpose
in adoptions. In many cases, however, the Internet is serving as a means to
facilitate the already controversial and growing practice of private
adoptions, and the illegal selling of babies.
Newsfactor Network spoke to several adoption experts who agreed that
bidding for babies on the Internet is illegal and unethical, but they differed on the
role the Internet should play in online adoptions.
Highest Bidder
Jane Nast, president of the American Adoption Congress, told NewsFactor that many of
these adoptions are being driven solely by checkbook, while
issues such as counseling and parent screening are being ignored entirely.
"Would you want to adopt a child through the Internet? Maybe people date on
the Internet," Nast said, "but children are not a commodity, and to adopt online is not
ethical or right."
Nast says that the majority of Net
adoptions are of healthy white infants. Older children, on the other hand, are
more likely to be adopted through traditional means.
Appropriate Net Uses
At the same time, Nast added that the Internet can serve some valuable functions to help
those engaged in legal adoption processes, and as a useful information
source for researching adoption agencies and advocacy groups.
A good example of proper Internet use, Nast says, is the posting of what were formerly
called "blue books," which list children available for adoption through reputable
non-profit groups such as
adopt.org.
"The first connection is made through the Internet. Beyond that, it is done
with real people. It is a way of communicating, but should not go beyond
that," Nast said.
Middle Man
Nathan Gwilliam, chairman of Adoption.com, the
Web's most frequented adoption site, sees a greater role for the Internet in the
adoption process. Adoption.com lists parents and birth mothers seeking to connect for
the purpose of entering into an adoption agreement.
But Gwilliam tells NewsFactor that the parents listed on his site must have been
pre-screened and meet minimum legal requirements for adoption, including
hiring an outside agency or social worker to undertake a home study. Once
the parties have agreed on an adoption, they must then retain an agency or
lawyer to facilitate the adoption through legal channels. (continued...)
|