Dear Visitor,

Our system has found that you are using an ad-blocking browser add-on.

We just wanted to let you know that our site content is, of course, available to you absolutely free of charge.

Our ads are the only way we have to be able to bring you the latest high-quality content, which is written by professional journalists, with the help of editors, graphic designers, and our site production and I.T. staff, as well as many other talented people who work around the clock for this site.

So, we ask you to add this site to your Ad Blocker’s "white list" or to simply disable your Ad Blocker while visiting this site.

Continue on this site freely
  HOME     MENU     SEARCH     NEWSLETTER    
NEWS & INFORMATION FOR TECHNOLOGY PURCHASERS. UPDATED 11 MINUTES AGO.
You are here: Home / Apple/Mac / Apple Can Seek Samsung Phone Ban
Court Allows Apple To Seek Samsung Phone Ban
Court Allows Apple To Seek Samsung Phone Ban
By Seth Fitzgerald / NewsFactor Network Like this on Facebook Tweet this Link thison Linkedin Link this on Google Plus
PUBLISHED:
NOVEMBER
20
2013

After winning its court case against Samsung, a judge has ruled that Apple can seek to ban the sale of Samsung phones if they infringe upon any of Apple's patents that were brought up in the lawsuit. Apple originally won a $1 billion settlement from Samsung last year and after another court case this month. The tech giant can now take things even further.

Judge Lucy Koh (who has presided over the case since 2011) was asked to reconsider her initial ruling and in doing so made it possible for Apple to seek bans against certain Samsung devices. While the money aspect of the case may not be very significant for Apple, the ban of one of its largest competitor's products would be huge.

The Money Issue

Both companies are now waiting to see how much Apple will receive from Samsung. A new jury was picked for this trial after the original jurors miscalculated the amount that should be owed to Apple.

Even though Koh revoked her $1 billion ruling and chose to put forth a $600 million resolution instead, Apple is still going after the $1 billion. While the sales ban may end up being more important, Apple and Samsung are eagerly awaiting the jury's decision regarding the money.

In its closing arguments, Apple tried to convince the jury that its decision would have a reverberating effect on other American companies that are trying to protect their patents. On the other hand, Samsung argued that the patents being discussed are not integral to either its own devices or to the iPhone and therefore they had no impact on sales.

Sales Ban

Even if it wins the $1 billion, that amount is only equal to about two weeks of iPhone sales, so for Apple, the sales ban on Samsung devices will be far more important moving forward.

Apple is fortunate that as a result of the patents being discussed, it may have an easy time when trying to ban the sale of Samsung devices in the U.S. This is because the patents cover simple technologies such as pinch to zoom, double-tap to zoom, and a bounce-back effect when the end of a document is reached.

All of these features were a major part of Apple's original iPhone marketing and enable the company to make the claim that they are important iPhone features. The court's ruling from yesterday only requires that Apple show that a patent was infringed upon and that the patent is important to iPhone sales.

However, surveys have come out showing that consumers would not be willing to pay significantly more for devices that have any of the features mentioned in Apple's patents. Unfortunately for Samsung, those surveys have yet to be brought up in the court case. Since it has already been ruled that Samsung infringed upon the patents, both companies will have to argue over how important those patents even are.

Tell Us What You Think
Comment:

Name:

Like Us on FacebookFollow Us on Twitter
MORE IN APPLE/MAC

NETWORK SECURITY SPOTLIGHT
U.S. and European officials say they've knocked out a cybercrime group accused of inflicting hundreds of millions of dollars in losses worldwide, putting five key suspects in custody.
NEWSFACTOR.COM
NEWSFACTOR NETWORK SITES
NEWSFACTOR SERVICES
© Copyright 2016 NewsFactor Network. All rights reserved. Member of Accuserve Ad Network.